jump to navigation

All I ever ‘Wanted’ June 27, 2008

Posted by Chris Stover in Cut to the Chase, Philadelphia.
Tags: ,
add a comment

Two movies are coming out this weekend of interest to me.  The first is WALL-E.  I hear the first 30 minutes or so have absolutely no dialogue.  That’s my kind of movie.

The second, as depicted above, is Wanted.  I’d compare it to a father-son version of Mr. and Mrs. Smith.  Angelina Jolie is in it, after all.  So is Morgan Freeman.  And if Morgan Freeman’s in it, you know you’ll at least smile when you see him.

Inquirer movie critic Steven Rea brought up a good point in his review today.  He said the movie is like “gun porn” because of its violent nature — lots of assassinations, lots of gunfire, lots of overall violence.  His thoughts:

The film’s fetishization of firearms should win it the NRA’s seal of approval. Maybe if the murder rate in Philadelphia wasn’t so sickeningly high, Wanted’s senseless adoration of assault weapons wouldn’t be so off-putting.

This is an extremely valid point.  I never thought that living in a city with such a situation would have an effect on how I watch and enjoy a movie.

Perhaps that’s why I wasn’t to keen on M. Night Shyamalan’s The Happening.  The gratuitous violence — especially the scenes from Rittenhouse Square, just blocks from my apartment — didn’t make the movie for me.  Shyamalan topped this off by a random newspaper with a headline that read, “Killadelphia.”  He likely intended to have a double meaning, but as Philadelphians look at it in context, the double meaning isn’t necessarily understood immediately.

But something to think about.  Does your living situation have an effect on how you watch movies?  I was always interested in seeing Wanted based on the previews, and then I read Rea’s thoughts.  Now I’m a bit skeptical.

Then again, there’s always WALL-E.

We can’t stop this from ‘Happening’ June 14, 2008

Posted by Chris Stover in Cut to the Chase.
Tags: , ,
1 comment so far

M. Night Shyamalan has done it again.  At least, he tried.

That’s what you’ll feel once you see The Happening.  Although, if you’d like to keep a sane, reconciled mind, you might want to avoid any related feelings by not seeing the movie.

Many have said Shyamalan needed this movie to rebuild his reputation.  The sense the audience gets is that he tried to hard to do that.  Instead, the audience is left with under- and overacting on the parts of Mark Wahlberg, Zooey Deschanel and John Leguizamo.  In other words, it’s difficult to take the dialogue seriously, even though it’s sincerely meant to be sincere.

The movie begins in Central Park, where people mysteriously stop in their tracks and are overcome with the desire to kill themselves - visualized by construction workers jumping off buildings.  Next, we jump to Rittenhouse Square in Philadelphia, where people do the same.  A cop turns his gun on himself, and two others steal his gun to do the same.

And so on.  People blame a terrorist attack, but in reality, it’s the plants — at least we think.  At just more than an hour and a half, not much is resolved in the end, other than Shyamalan’s message that Mother Nature will turn on us if we keep treating her poorly.

So Wahlberg and his crew flee the city and aim for the countryside, where this mysterious suicide plague doesn’t seem to be occurring.  Meanwhile, we see two tweens get shot by a rifle and a man kill himself by lying in front of a moving lawnmower.  Yes, we literally see.

What Shyamalan conveys best is the suspense - those times when you know something’s about to happen, and even though you’re expecting it, it still makes you jump.  But that’s all the umph the movie had.  The ending leaves the audience with many unanswered questions - mostly how and why - therefore leaving an unsatisfied audience.

Seeing this movie in a Philadelphia theater made it more interesting.  At one point, a headline appears on the screen that simply says “Killadelphia.”  The audience, of course, laughed, but that’s probably unique to Philadelphia-area theaters.  But this added nothing to the movie — only took away.

Which brings me back to my original point.  Shyamalan is trying too hard.  If he keeps trying to push these movies out every two years, he’ll never meet the same success as The Sixth Sense.  Shyamalan gave no prescreenings of the film, not even to critics, which I think was a mistake.  I’d have liked to see the film without much of the gratuitous, disturbing violence.  I’d have liked to see some of the characters built more.  I’d have liked to see more resolutions throughout the movie.

Instead, we’re left with a sudden, unsatisfying ending that partially makes you feel bad for Shyamalan. And for the city of Philadelphia — that keeps getting a bad rep for continuing to be the bastion of bad movies by overzealous writer/producer/directors.

Recouting ‘Recount’ May 26, 2008

Posted by Chris Stover in Cut to the Chase.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

It’s probably a movie that 99.3 percent of Hollywood wanted to take part in. But there were only enough characters for a few.

Tonight on HBO (2, maybe), I got sucked in by Recount, a movie chronicling the complexity of the 2000 presidential election. I turned it on and really couldn’t turn it off, so therefore, I recommend it.

Of course, expect a strong liberal bias. Kevin Spacey and Dennis Leary aren’t too keen on remaining objective in their roles, but hey — it’s Hollywood.

Despite knowing the outcome, Recount somehow keeps you on the edge of your seat. We see archive footage of Tom Brokaw, Dan Rather and Peter Jennings in addition to video from Fox News and CNN.

Side note: Remember what CNN or Fox looked like without the crawl at the bottom? Well, this shows you. I kind of miss those days.

There’s a scene where Al Gore is about to make his concession speech in front of thousands of supporters. One of his aides, who has a severe limp after pulling a muscle in his leg, attempts to stop the vice president because of breaking news — the numbers the networks were reporting were incorrect. Gore is steps from the stage, and the aide is trying his best to reach him. I haven’t been so worried since watching Simba vs. Scar in The Lion King.

It’s a very well done HBO film, but there are some flaws. The bias gets a little too goofy. Katherine Harris, the now infamous former Florida Secretary of State, was portrayed as a makeup-laden ditz. OK, all opinions aside, the performance by Laura Dern seemed a little too stereotypically blonde (Harris, though, is a brunette).

At the conclusion of the film (SPOILER ALERT: GORE DOESN’T WIN THE PRESIDENCY!) Spacey’s character is having a conversation with a Republican leader (paraphrased):

SPACEY: “Did the best man win?”
REPUBLICAN: “Yes.”
SPACEY: “Are you sure about that?”
REPUBLICAN: “I’m as sure about that as you are for your man.”
SPACEY: “I hope you’re right.”

After pans of a FEMA headline and Katherine Harris riding a horse after her Congress win, the credits roll. The song in the background? Tom Petty’s “I Won’t Back Down.”

So…expect the bias, but Recount is an interesting movie to see. I guess it was made to reminisce about what could have been.

But, in my opinion as summarized by Dennis Leary’s character at the end of the movie in the most cliche of modern cliches, “it is what it is.” But dwell on the past anyway.